Thursday, October 14, 2010

Heating Up for the Elections

In the upcoming elections in November, one of the most contentious ballot issues will be solved. If proposition 19 passes, California will become the first state to completely legalize marijuana. All adults over the age of 21 would be able to carry up to an ounce of weed without having to worry about the cops busting them. If legalized it is estimated that California could save up to 7.7 billion dollars on law enforcement and make 2.2 billion on the taxes they could apply to it. The amount of pot related arrests would drop by up to 60,000 per year. It has recently been backed by retired police chiefs, judges, and other state officials. Even if it passes, the Californians are probably far from being able to finally legally light up due to the Drug Enforcement Administration who will most likely persuade the government to make a legal challenge against the proposition. It could be years before this proposition could become a law.

Some believe that the costs of controlling marijuana production and sale will cost us more than it will benefit us. These people also believe there are many dangers in the decriminalization of weed. Alex Wodak and Colin Drummond explain that there are several social costs to this too. If it is legalized, they believe many will become less productive in their workplace which in the end will cause the economy overall to respond negatively. Policymakers in the US also agree that marijuana is a dangerous drug. They feel that it is a stepping stone to other, worse drugs which can cause real harm to the body, such as cocaine and heroine. Some other negative effects are short term memory loss, difficulty thinking and problem solving, lack of coordination making one prone to injury, inability to perform complex tasks for a limited time, distorted senses, reduced athletic ability, elevated heart rate, and anxiety/ panic attacks. The President opposes the legalization of marijuana. When asked if he thinks if the legalization of marijuana would benefit our economy he responded, "The answer is, no, I don't think that is a good strategy to grow our economy... I don't think it's the right route for the American economy."
for more information- www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DanBLgI_g0

The McLaughlin Group has a few thoughts about it. First of all they believe that it shouldn't be legalized on the federal level and should be approached state by state. The group thinks that wherever the debate comes up on the state level it will be passed and legalized for that state and so far this seems to be true. They don't think Obama will choose to show ant interest in this because the health care reform has enough complexity involved in it already. One lady thinks that Governor Schwarzenegger is the only one who could dare to take this on. They seem to like the idea of taxing marijuana to help the economy of California, and they go to point out how Milton Friedman thought it would benefit our economy. Lastly they point out that the legalization of marijuana would be safer than the underground sales which occur now. Other debates like this go on daily regarding this subject. There are thousands of people on each side of this heated subject.

GreenGro Technologies has their own views on medical marijuana. They grow medical marijuana in 14 different states, including: * Alaska * California * Colorado * Hawaii * Maine * Michigan * Montana * Nevada * New Jersey * New Mexico * Oregon * Rhode Island * Vermont * and Washington. These 14 states and DC all have different limits on how much medicinal marijuana can be possessed at each time. Just recently a study was done in Pennsylvania and it was found that 80% of the population supports the legalization of medicinal marijuana, so they might not be far behind. These regulations have to do with ounces of weed and the number of plants one has. Their company has done a lot of research regarding which diseases marijuana can help relieve the symptoms of of even help heal. These diseases include: * tourette syndrome * post-traumatic stress disorder * alzheimers * multiple schlarosis * parkinsons * glaucoma * autism * cancer * schizophrenia. This company obviously is pro-legalization because this is how the company runs. "The newest results showed that medical marijuana: helps prevent the natural neural degradation from neuro-degenerative diseases, inhibits/slows cancer cell growth, and its as effective as atypical antipsychotics in treating schizophrenia"(GreenGro, 6).

Here are some statistics I found regarding the subject:
= marijuana cannot cause permanent mental illness
= marijuana is not addictive
= marijuana is considered the #1 gateway drug
= the average age of experimentation is 14 years old
= 97.5 million Americans have tried smoking weed
= since 1996 the percentage of 8th graders who had tried marijuana has dropped almost six
= since 2005 over 300,000 people have used marijuana for its medicinal purposes

If you are interested and have a minute or two, these two videos really helped me develop a basis of information on this debate...
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2ezdiwaaLI
- www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLQPtZs5TP8&feature=related

4 comments:

  1. You did a great job of addressing both sides of the story. You also showed two different stories which condused me a little bit because you talked about marijuana and then just switched to medical marijuana. I really enjoyed reading this post though it was well layed out except for the lack of transition. I would also talk more about the topic of marijuana being legalized in California. Simply becasue i am not going to need medical marijuana im going to use regualr marijuana.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your argument is clearly stated in your analysis. The intro to you analysis provides the necessary background information for someone who is not informed about the marijuana situation in California too. You show both sides of the argument on the legalization of marijuana, providing an unbiased analysis of your argument. Evidence about why people think marijuana should be legalized is equal to the evidence about why people do not think marijuana should be legalized. Personally I think marijuana should be legalized because in my opinion the benefits of legal marijuana outweigh the negative effects of legal marijuana. Nice analysis!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was too distracted by wondering where your later posts are, and wondering why your links were not embedded to fully engage with the analysis. However, it seems to me that the two sides of this issue are VERY broadly laid out, which makes it difficult for you to focus specifically and in detail and thus create an argument situated in specific evidence. What are the implications of this particular law? Not legalizing pot in general, but legalizing possession of one ounce? On what grounds do the two sides disagree not only about marijuana, but legalization issues in general? What does each group think society should look like, and how do they think society should be regulated?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This article is really good, I like it so much, there are some nice things you share in your blog. herbal smoke

    ReplyDelete